What is the role of Greenpeace in the Global Warming debate?

Question

Another question if you have a moment. What about Greenpeace - 
similar scenario to AVAAZ? - just checked their homepage and they are 
still talking about Copenhagen and the need for emissions 
reductions ..... no mention of climategat/e-mails etc.

Response

By their fruits you shall know them.

The answer to your question is obvious once you know that Greenpeace is advocating for the New World Order climate change agenda and a Copenhagen Treaty (however described). IMHO it is just not credible that any genuine organization with an environmental focus could not know that the claim that CO2 causes global warming and/or climate change is a scam.

On 14 October 2009, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40&feature=player_embedded

In my view Lord Monckton provides the answer to your question when he says (from 1'21" into the video until 1'45"):

`So at last the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement and took over Greenpeace so that my friends who founded it left within a year, because they'd captured it; Now the apotheosis is at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world.'

Sooo, whatever the situation may have been in earlier times (and I don't necessarily accept that Greenpeace was genuine before the collapse of the Berlin Wall because the Bolsheviks were expelled from the Soviet Union in the mid to late 1970s NOT in 1989, see Dr Peter Beter's Audio Letters at: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/audioletters/audioletters_74.htm )
Lord Monckton attests that Greenpeace was taken over by Bolsheviks almost 20 years ago, if not before. Presumably then, Greenpeace is under the control of the Rothschild banksters via their Bolshevik puppets.

Be aware though, that Lord Monckton doesn't have (or at least doesn't portray) the full picture. In truth his reference to a so-called `communist world government' should be referred to as a BOLSHEVIK world government because the Russian Revolution was actually a Rothschild (and Rockefeller) funded Bolshevik (ie Khazar Jewish) revolution in which the Khazars revenged themselves on the Christian Russians who defeated and dispossessed the vicious Khazar Empire (Kingdom) then situated in what is now the Ukraine and Southern Russia, in the early 11th century. The so-called Communist Soviet Union was really a Khazar Jewish Bolshevik dictatorship from 1917 until the Bolsheviks were  finally ousted by a Russian Christian group around 1977-1978. That Christian group had failed to realise in 1917 just what vicious genocidal killers the Bolshevik Jews* were and as Dr Peter Beter records, it took them over 60 years to eradicate the Khazar Bolshevik cadres from the Soviet leadership. See for instance Dr Beter's discussion around the middle of Audio Letter No 76 where he talks about the vicious infighting in the US between the ex-Soviet US Bolsheviks and the Rockefeller cartel from 1979 (after Nelson Rockefeller was assassinated by the US Bolsheviks in January 1979):
http://www.peterdavidbeter.com/docs/Dr-Peter-Beter/Dr_Peter_Beter_AL-76-Part-01.mp3

* The truth is that Bolshevik Jews, that is, Ashkenazi (Khazar) Jews exterminated 100 million innocent Christians (mostly Russians and Ukrainians between 1917 and the removal of the Bolshevik Jews from power in the Soviet Union (which was a Khazar Jewish creation) in the late 1970s. This enormous REAL holocaust of Christian Russians is confirmed by Hatonn. See: HATONN: 'WHO ARE THE KHAZARS?'
From: Phoenix Journal #68: Ecstasy To Agony - Through the Plan 2000, chapter 14, see: http://abundanthope.net/pages/article_4018.shtml

**********************

On another occasion, on 30 April 1982 in Audio Letter No 74 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/audioletters/audioletters_74.htm
Dr Beter says:

`Last month I mentioned that the Bolsheviks here are benefiting from war preparations which were started by the Rockefellers long ago. It has only been about three years since the Rockefellers were dislodged as the prime movers of the United States Government by the Bolsheviks. Since that time the United States Government has been a house divided, torn by internal power struggles between rival Bolshevik and Rockefeller factions. But before that, the United States had been dominated for decades both economically and politically by the Four Rockefeller Brothers.

The Rockefeller cartel and Russia's new anti-Bolshevik rulers are working together in a race against time to try to head off the Bolshevik [nuclear] war plan.'

Incidentally, apropos of the ability of the Bankster matrix controllers to create "spontaneous" public concern about an issue, Dr Beter said:

`What we are watching is the Rockefeller public relations machine at work. As I've explained in the past, the Rockefeller cartel cannot afford to let a nuclear war take place. If it does, they will lose everything because they are not in a position to control it. Instead, the deadly enemies of the Rockefeller cartel, the Bolsheviks here, will win out if there is a war; and so the Rockefeller faction is now doing everything in its power to prevent a nuclear war.

Meanwhile, the Rockefeller strategists here are now concentrating on a fast-building, anti-nuclear-war campaign. On all sides now we are hearing about the so-called "nuclear freeze movement." There are documentaries, articles, publicity of all kinds to sensitize us to the terrors of nuclear war. In recent months, there have even been referenda popping up on election ballots dealing with the nuclear war issue. Medical doctors are banding together to warn the public about what would happen if there were a nuclear war.

We are being told that all this is just popping up spontaneously. We are now 37 years into the nuclear age and nothing like this has ever gained so much momentum before, yet now we are supposed to believe that millions of Americans have spontaneously gotten the same ideas at the same time. If you believe that, my friends, I give up. Movements like this never, and I mean never, develop without leadership, organization, and money - and plenty of it.'

Ron: That was almost 30 years ago. In this cell phone, internet age the ability of the matrix controllers to create "spontaneous" public campaigns must be exponentially greater today. In my opinion the Greenpeace campaign in favour of the bogus Global Warming Copenhagen Treaty evidences that the underlying purpose of Greenpeace’s current managers and controllers is to foment seemingly spontaneous public campaigns clamoring for political and economic outcomes sought by the banksters and their New World Order agenda.

NOTE: I am not saying that Greenpeace and similar organizations have been  infiltrated and corrupted to the extent that the fact that their top level managements are corrupted or misdirected also taints the work and INTENT of the mass of members who work diligently and genuinely for worthy goals within Greenpeace and similar organizations, and their various campaigns. Clearly that is not the case. And "yes" much good is done thereby. But, I am saying that the efforts of Greenpeace and similar global mass public interest organizations are being subtly misdirected by bankster agents (however described), so that much of the potential energy for "good" being expended by millions of members is being misdirected and wasted. Worse yet, I think that Greenpeace et al are actually used by the banksters to delude and enslave humanity - as would have happened had the Copenhagen Treaty been agreed to as Greenpeace and Avaaz were advocating.

In contrast, imagine the potential positive effects on global consciousness if the membership of Greenpeace (and other mass organizations like Amnesty International and Avaaz actually understood our global situation in terms of the Urantia book, the Phoenix Journals and the channelled advice being given to AH by CM, Esu and other Celestials. Scams like Global Warming would be stopped dead in their tracks and governments would be changed radically almost overnight.

I think that when considering these issues  everyone should trust self, personal feelings and intuition, provided that they also use their intellect and reasoning ability to decode, interpret and understand the signals coming in from the outside world when doing so.

Namaste
Ron